Quick Film Reviews

StoriesByPhil > Quick Film Reviews > SCREENWRITER AT THE MOVIES: ‘Gold’ (2016)
gold movie screenwriting Matthew McConaughey

SCREENWRITER AT THE MOVIES: ‘Gold’ (2016)

Feb 21, 2017 Phil Parker 2 Quick Film Reviews, Screenwriting , , ,

Screenwriters – Make your hero earn it.

Before I left for the cinema I checked Rotten Tomatoes. They had ‘Gold’ rated at 41% critics/ 51% fans. Normally, that’s a pretty good Gold Matthew McConaugheysign to avoid a film, but I’m a fan of some of those reality TV shows about gold mining, and of Matthew McConaughey, so I ignored them all and went anyway.

Despite McConaughey’s fantastic performance, the ratings turned out to be mostly right. As a screenwriter, I’m glad I still went, though. I always say we can learn as much, if not more, from films that aren’t perfect than from those that are. ‘Gold’ reinforced for me a very important lesson: heroes that don’t learn anything leave an audience unfulfilled.

First, a quick summary of the movie (skip to the next paragraph if you want to avoid these spoilers):

The hero in Gold, Kenny Wells (Matthew McConaughey) has inherited his family’s mining company, only to run it into the ground (pun intended). In a last ditch effort to save it, he teams up with a discredited gold prospector, Michael Acosta (Edgar Ramirez) to hunt for gold in the jungles of Indonesia. When they strike it rich, the company goes public and they all make a fortune. It’s peaches and cream for Kenny and his loving wife Kay (Bryce Dallas Howard) until the inevitable lure of women and money creates a rift between the money-hungry husband and the salt-of-the-earth wife. But Kenny seems to get on just fine without her, until his biggest competitor convinces Indonesia’s president to nationalize Kenny’s company. Penniless, Kenny returns to his ex-wife only to discover she’s dating someone else. Bummer. In another desperate effort to save his company, Kenny and Michael agree to give Indonesia’s president’s son 85%. Everyone’s happy! That is until it’s discovered Acosta faked the gold results. There is no gGold Matthew McConaugheyold! The company fails, Acosta goes missing and Kenny is left with nothing, again. Poor Kenny goes back to his ex-wife, AGAIN, tail between his legs, hoping for consolation. What he gets is a check in the mail from the AWOL Acosta for $84 million. Role credits.

First of all, kudos to Patrick Massett, John Zinman for even getting the story on the screen. Writing a screenplay is a heck of a lot of work, and out of the thousands that are written every year, very few get made. So forgive me guys for a little Monday-morning quarterbacking. My only goal is to learn and improve as a screenwriter.

Ok, disclaimer out of the way.

On the surface, this ‘inspired by true events’ story is fascinating. I can see why the producers were sold on the idea. It embodies the American dream of the scrappy underdog who works his ass off and builds a fortune from nothing. He gets knocked down, not once, but twice, and still ends up on his feet. The problem is, Kenny doesn’t come out of the storm having learned a valuable lesson that the audience can take away with them. He doesn’t change; he doesn’t arc — so I don’t care.Gold Matthew McConaughey

Now, not all heroes have to change. Matt Damon in The Martian didn’t change and people loved that. James Bond (traditionally) and most Superheroes don’t change during a film and we know how much money those movies make. But this isn’t that kind of a movie

This guy was a hard-drinking, chain-smoking man who was loved by a sweet wife and just wanted to save his daddy’s company. He gave his loyalty to a man he hardly knew and was betrayed. When he was rich, it was fun and he deserved it, but he went too far and lost the love of his life. These are all the ingredients you need to deliver an emotionally satisfying film – if only they’re properly arced – but they never are.

Had he confessed to the woman he loved that money wasn’t everything (hopefully in a non-cliché way), maybe then he would have deserved his reward. Had he unwaveringly believed in the partner they say betrayed him and NOT given him up to the feds, then maybe he would have earned that money. Instead, we have a hero in the beginning of the film that believed in not giving up, but in the end does give up, and yet heGold Matthew McConaughey gets rewarded anyway.  The money just falls in his lap. And we’re kinda led to believe that his boomerang relationship with his wife will kick off again into happily ever after.

That’s not the kind of easy ending audiences want to see.

So my screenwriting lesson from watching ‘Gold’ was this:

Make sure your hero learns their lesson (unless they’re a tragic hero). When they do, their reward will feel deservedClick To Tweet Otherwise, it’s just like your hero won the lottery, which emotionally negates the entire movie that preceded that moment.

Phil Parker

Screenwriter Phil Parker is one of ISA’s Top 25 Screenwriters to Watch in 2018. His multi-award winning WWII script is being packaged by BAFTA-winning producer Sias Wilson in London; and two animation projects he was hired to work on are in development with Tent Pictures in Abu Dhabi. Phil is also a sought-after script consultant with clients in Australia, the US and England.

- Twitter - Facebook - Google+
Comments (2)
  1. George "Clay" Mitchell    | Reply

    I caught XANADU over the weekend. I had never seen it, but the flaws were the same. It had a great set-up a struggling artist decides to go back to commercial work to make money, meets a clarinet player and they open a club together. The End.

    There were no real obstacles to overcome, even when he learns his muse (who is one of the Nine Muses from Greek mythology) has to return and they’ll be forever separated. However, it was so telegraphed what was going to happen, you didn’t even get a sense that she would ever return.

    The muse was also the same gal the clarinet player fell in love with about 30 years before. She inspired him artistically, but when she left, his passion for music left with him. It was a great setup for the message of what’s more important following your heart or following your dreams (when both things are different.) But it was just one musical number after the next.

    I was rather enthralled by Olivia Newton-John’s voice, and the movie may have featured her best music and performances, but it could have been so much more.

    I feel rather idiotic lamenting about failings of a 1970s roller-disco musical but seeing movies with flaws like this may help keep me from falling into the same kind of traps.

  2. Phil Parker - Post Author     | Reply

    Thanks for commenting, George. I never did get around to seeing Xanadu. Not a musical lover myself. Trying to muster the interest to go see La La Land. Lots of people raving about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top